Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

Library

How the design and complexity of concept maps influence cognitive learning processes

Users: 2 - Average Rating: 5.00


The paper attracted me due to the interest of our consortium in using networks. Concept maps have this structure, where nodes are concepts and arcs provide the relation between them. The idea is a student (called learner) may be aided to understand the whole structure of a system b graphically ordering in 2D. Uf, I realise that I have been studying 55 years without creating a concept map. Apparently, visual ordering of concepts is not a great aid to me.

The paper basically reports experiments with students on material with the logical conclusion that if you make more mess out of the concept map, the student is getting more disoriented "significantly". The variables are to have less or more concept nodes and to place them more or less well organised, called salient. An interesting experiment, but the result des not surprise me in a Popperian sense.

Type:
Scientific Paper

Area:
Data Analytics

Target Group:
Basic

DOI:
10.1007/s11423-022-10083-2


Cite as:
Krieglstein, F., Schneider, S., Beege, M. et al. How the design and complexity of concept maps influence cognitive learning processes. Education Tech Research Dev 70, 99–118 (2022)

Author of the review:
Eligius Hendrix
University of Malaga


Reviews

You have to login to leave a comment. If you are not registered click here

Andrej Košir


This paper includes useful hints for Learning indicators in terms of 1. Optimizing OptLearn algorithm 2. Evaluating OptLearn algorithms They are useful for OptLearn algorithms (versions of it) linked to Conceptual maps and also to those not related to it.

Pablo Guerrero-Garcia


The added bonus of this paper is that it directly leads to two learning indicators (extrated from the graph structure and complexity, cf. more details in the Learning Indicators section of this iMath library), hence you can measure the learner cognitive state before using some (technological or not) learning tool/environment and after using it to check if there has been some improvement ;-)